·
American College of Gastroenterology Practice
Guidelines 2012
o
NG or OG lavage is not required in patients in
UGIB for diagnosis, prognosis, visualization or therapeutic effect. [i]
§
Bloody or coffee ground NG aspirates clearly
document upper GI bleed, but a clear of bile-stained aspirate may be seen in up
to 18% of patients with upper GI source.
§
Prospective trial with 325 patients, 11% of
patients with confirmed UGIB and shock had negative NG aspirate. [ii]
o
Retrospective study in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2011
§
632 patients with GI bleeding found no
statistical difference in 30 day mortality, mean hospital LOS, or transfusion
requirements
§
NG lavage was associated to earlier time to
endoscopy, but did not change outcomes
·
Visualization
o
Prospective randomized multicenter study
published in Annals of Emergency Medicine
2011
§
253 patients, 6 different EDS
§
No difference in visualization during endoscopy
between groups receiving IV erythromycin prior to endoscopy vs NGT alone vs NGT
+ Erythromycin[iv]
§
Therefore, NGT not only option to improve
visualization during endoscopy for UGIB
[i] L. Laine, and D.M. Jensen,
"Management of patients with ulcer bleeding.", The American
journal of gastroenterology, 2012.
[ii] Lin
HJ, Kun W, Perng CL et al. Early or delayed endoscopy for patients with
peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective randomized study. J Clin Gastroenterol
1996;22:267–71.
[iii] E.S. Huang, S. Karsan, F.
Kanwal, I. Singh, M. Makhani, and B.M. Spiegel, "Impact of nasogastric
lavage on outcomes in acute GI bleeding.", Gastrointestinal endoscopy,
2011.
[iv] D. Pateron et al.
"Erythromycin infusion or gastric lavage for upper gastrointestinal
bleeding: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.", Annals of
emergency medicine, 2011.
from Dr. Felipe Grimaldo
No comments:
Post a Comment