Welcome to the Education Blog for the Cook County Trauma, Burn and Wound Care Units.
We hope that you find this blog educational and informative.
Please feel free to leave comments, or email us with any questions or topics you would like to see addressed.

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Colon Injuries: Repair or Resect, Reconnect or Divert


Colonic injuries are commonly addressed during exploration for GSWs and stab wounds to the abdomen.  Many factors must be taken into account regarding the management of these injuries including the extent of the injury, hemodynamic stability of the patient, amount of resuscitation required, and additional co-morbidities.  Injuries are divided into non-destructive or destructive injuries.  Traditionally, destructive injuries affect greater than 50% of the colon wall and are not amendable to primary repair.  Less severe injuries can be closed primarily.  With destructive injuries, once the affected colon is resected, a decision has to be made regarding how GI continuity will be restored.  If the ends can be brought together easily with no tension and a good blood supply is palpated, a hand-sewn or stapled anastomosis can be completed.  In elective colorectal surgery, research has demonstrated that these two methods are equally safe with limited amounts of complications, however there is still controversy in trauma literature with several retrospective studies demonstrating that a stapled anastomosis has an increased leak rate and increased tendency for intra-abdominal abscess formation.  Some may choose to protect the anastomosis with a proximal ostomy, however this has not been shown to decrease the rate of complications.  The alternative would be to bring up an ostomy with a mucous fistula or Hartman’s.  This is the preferred method in a patient with a large resuscitation requiring greater than 6 U PRBCs, hypotension, other significant abdominal injuries, large stool spillage, or significant comorbities

 

In the era of damage control or abbreviated laparotomy, many times there is a delay between the original resection and final management of the GI tract.   Patients that do require a large resuscitation, have significant other injuries or large amounts are spillage tend to fall into this group.  At the initial operation, severely damaged bowel is resected, the GI tract is left in discontinuity and the abdomen is left open.  Patient is taken to the ICU, allowed to recover and have their physiologic state optimized before return to the OR.  The few retrospective studies that have looked at this subgroup have demonstrated that an anastomosis is safe when the patient returns to the OR, however there maybe a slightly increased risk of anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess especially if the patient requires an open abdomen for greater than 5 days.  Further research in this area is required to determine the best management guidelines for this subgroup.

 

SOURCES:

 

1. Brundage SI et al. Stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient: A multicenter trial. The Journal of Trauma. 2001; 51(6):1054-1061.

2. Sharpe JP et al. Adherence to a simplified management algorithm reduces morbidity and mortality after penetrating colon injuries: A 15- year experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 214(4):591-597.

3. Georgoff P et al. Colonic injuries and the damage control abdomen: does management strategy matter. Journal of Surgical Research. 2013; 181:293-299.

 
from Dr. Purvi Patel

No comments:

Post a Comment