After finding and correcting the
source of “surgical” bleeding, the next major task is to keep the trauma
patient in shock from experiencing extensive ongoing “nonsurgical”
bleeding. Several retrospective reviews
have demonstrated an incidence of coagulopathy in trauma as 25-30%. Patients with increased wound severity scores
and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores exhibit worse coagulopathy secondary
to tissue hypoperfusion and tissue injury.
In 80-100% of patients with a GCS less than 6, some evidence of
coagulopathy is seen. A few different
factors are important to consider when attempting to correct a patient’s
coagulopathy. These factors include
acidosis and hypothermia (figure 1).
Acidosis can be seen with tissue hypoperfusion and with
subsequent inflammatory and metabolic changes.
Problems with hemostasis are especially noted once the pH is below 7.2. This
low pH has been noted to affect the enzyme activity of factor V, VIIa, and X
and inhibits thrombin generation. Hypothermia
also can cause bleeding abnormalities through decreased platelet responsiveness
and altered enzyme functioning at temperatures below 35◦ C. Colder temperatures also cause increased
fibrinolysis and decreased thromboxane B2 production, thus resulting in various
alterations in the coagulation cascade.
In addition to these disturbances in enzymatic and platelet function, a
consumptive coagulopathy also occurs in these trauma cases when platelets and
coagulation factors begin to be used.
This further contributes to the picture of trauma-induced coagulopathy
(figure 2).
The question
then is how do we correct and avoid these factors which lead to such
significant coagulopathy in our severely injured trauma patients. It is important to start with simple
strategies like correcting the hypothermia with rewarming techniques such as
covering the patient with heating blankets, giving warmed IV fluids, and
considering body cavity lavage. We must
be aware of the base deficit and lactate level in order to correct the metabolic
acidosis that is present in these patients.
The base deficit is thought to correlate with the severity of shock and
can help guide our resuscitation efforts.
Lactate has also been shown to help in this and may be a predictor of
mortality but can take longer to obtain.
In addition to laboratory values, a patient may be deemed coagulopathic
by just clinical signs such as generalized nonsurgical bleeding from serosal
surfaces, IV access sites, wounds, and skin edges. While we start our resuscitation with
isotonic crystalloids, more emphasis is being placed on the early use of blood
products due to the potential adverse effects of crystalloids. Unlike blood products, crystalloids cannot
increase the oxygen carrying capacity in a patient, and they can also cause
undesirable consequences such as immune activation, decreased cellular function,
worsening hyperchloremic acidosis, and increased fluid extravasation into the
lungs and abdomen.
Damage
control resuscitation involves various components such as fresh frozen plasma
(FFP), packed red blood cells (PRBCs), platelets, cryoprecipitate, and factor
VIIA. Depending on the condition of the
patient, a massive transfusion protocol (MTP) may be initiated based on certain
factors like a systolic blood pressure less than 90mmHg, a base deficit of 4 or
less, and attending choice. At Cook
County, this ensures that 6U of PRBCs, 6U of FFP, and 5U of platelets are on
their way. In addition to giving PRBCs,
it is important to start infusing these other blood products as quickly as
possible in patients who present in hemorrhagic shock. FFP can help correct the coagulation factors
that have been exhausted because it contains fibrinogen and all the pro- and
anticoagulant blood proteins. Different
studies have shown lower mortality rates in exsanguinating patients who
received early administration of FFP with the optimal ratio of FFP to PRBC of 1
: 1. This survival benefit of giving
increased amounts of FFP is especially true in patients who require multiple
units of PRBCs. While decreased
mortality has been shown with a similar dispensation of platelets, their functionality
is lost during storage and some data suggests that they have no effect on
survival. While both platelets and FFP
are important in damage control resuscitation, we must also be aware of their
potential side effects such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and
transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI).
Another
product to consider giving to patients is cryoprecipitate. This will help give certain additional plasma
factors—fibrinogen, von-Willebrand factor, factors VIII and XIII, and
fibronectin. This should be given in
hemorrhaging patients whose fibrinogen level is less than 100 mg/dL. Interestingly, about one dose of
cryoprecipitate provides the same amount of fibrinogen that six units of FFP
provide. Factor VIIA and tranexamic acid
(TXA) are other adjunctive treatments to consider in these situations. The mechanism of action of factor VIIA in
trauma patients is not completely understood but it is thought to activate
factor X and subsequently the common coagulation pathway. A few keys to giving this is that it is
limited to three doses and it requires the patient’s pH to be greater than 7.2
in order to function properly. TXA, a
derivative of lysine, works well within only the first 3 to 8 hours. In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial
know as CRASH-2, TXA was proven to have some benefit in trauma patients. It helps to prevent fibrinolysis by
competitively inhibiting the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin. Both cryoprecipitate and TXA should be
considered when treating trauma patients with ongoing hemorrhage and
coagulopathy.
Of course
the initial concern in trauma patients who present in hemorrhagic shock is to
find what is bleeding and control it surgically. The next hurdle, as discussed above, is to
address the other factors that will contribute to the patient’s coagulopathic
state and nonsurgical bleeding. Finally,
one must think about giving blood products and various additional treatments as
needed and early on in the resuscitative process.
Sources:
·
Dr.
Kimberly Joseph- “Damage Control Resuscitation” Trauma & Burn Symposium,
June 14-15, 2013.
·
Duchesne
JC, McSwain NE, Cotton BA, et al. Damage
Control Resuscitation: The New Face of Damage Control. J
Trauma. 2010; 69 (4): 976-990.
·
CRASH-2
trial collaborators. Effects of
tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in
trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The
Lancet. 2010; 376: 23-32.
from Dr. Jennifer Jolley


No comments:
Post a Comment